Court of Cassation Rules Against Expansive Use of Website Blocking Regulations

. This paper examines how the judiciary has approached blocking as an exceptional measure that directly affects freedom of expression and access to information, and it traces the legislative context that enabled the expansion of blocking practices, from national security cases to disputes involving intellectual property and unfair competition.

Read More

New Judicial Trend: Criminal Court Overturns Conviction Due to Invalidity of Digital Forensic Evidence

In a new judicial development, the Shebin El-Kom Criminal Court overturned a conviction against a defendant in a cyber extortion case conducted via the “WhatsApp” application, after it was proven that the digital forensic evidence used against him was invalid due to the authorities’ failure to comply with the legal and technical standards governing its collection and analysis. This paper examines the court’s reasoning in detail.

Read More

Rethinking Cybercrime: New Crimes or New Technologies for Old Crimes?

This paper seeks to engage with the ongoing debate surrounding the concept of ‘cybercrime’. It presents arguments in favor of establishing a distinct classification termed “cybercrime”, as well as the counterarguments asserting that crime, in its essence, remains constant, with technology serving merely as a new instrument for the commission of traditional offenses.

Read More

Powers and Oversight in the Digital Space: The Crime of Operating a Website without a License and the Authority of the Supreme Council for Media Regulation

The crime of “operating a website without a license” presents a set of complex legal and constitutional challenges in Egypt. Since the introduction of the Press and Media Regulation Law, the licensing requirement has been increasingly applied to a broad range of websites, often extending beyond the explicit scope defined by the law and the Constitution. This paper offers a critical legal analysis of this expanding regulatory framework.

Read More